10.24873/j.rpemd.2022.03.862

Case Report

 

Root canal treatment of a maxillary second molar with four mesiobuccal root canals – a case report

Tratamento endodôntico do segundo molar maxilar com quatro canais mesiovestibulares – caso clinic

 

Flávia Cracel Nogueira¹ 0000-0003-1353-4231

Mariana Domingos Pires¹ 0000-0002-6528-5882

Abayomi O. Baruwa¹ 0000-0002-1670-8674

Beatriz Pereira¹ 0000-0003-1290-0690

Jorge N.R. Martins^1,2,3,* 0000-0002-6932-2038

António Ginjeira^1,2 0000-0001-5114-1426

¹ Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal ² Unidade de Investigação em Ciências Orais e Biomédicas (UICOB), Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal ³ Centro de Estudo de Medicina Dentária Baseada na Evidência (CEMDBE) – Cochrane Portugal, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal

 

^*Correspondence to:

 

Article history:

Received 7 September 2021

Accepted 12 January 2022

Available online 16 March 2022

 

Abstract

Among the roots of maxillary molars, the mesiobuccal often presents with a root canal system that may be complex and variable, leading to a greater challenge when trying to achieve a proper chemo-mechanical preparation. The present report intends to show a successful root canal treatment of a maxillary second molar with six root canals, of which four were present in the mesiobuccal root. After being diagnosed with pulp necrosis and symptomatic apical periodontitis, a molar was endodontically treated. It also had an uncommon paracone cusp. A careful inspection of the pulp chamber floor revealed a mesiopalatal sulcus, which, after exploration with ultrasonic tips under an operating microscope magnification, showed three additional mesiobuccal root canals. After proper mechanical debridement, disinfection with sodium hypochlorite, and warm gutta-percha obturation, a favorable outcome was observed at the 12-month follow-up.

Keywords: Anatomy, Endodontics, Maxillary molar, Mesiobuccal root, Paramolar tubercule, Root canal therapy

 

Resumo

De entre as raízes dos molares maxilares, as mesiovestibulares são as que mais frequentemente apresentam um sistema canalar complexo e variável, podendo conduzir a uma maior dificuldade na obtenção de uma adequada preparação químico-mecânica. O presente trabalho pretende reportar o tratamento endodôntico bem-sucedido de um segundo molar maxilar com seis canais radiculares, em que quatro deles se encontravam na raiz mesiovestibular. Depois de ter sido diagnosticado com uma necrose com periodontite apical sintomática, o molar, que também apresentava uma incomum cúspide paracone, foi tratado endodonticamente. Uma cuidadosa análise da câmara pulpar revelou um sulco mesiopalatino, que, depois de devidamente explorado com pontas de ultrassons sob a magnificação de um microscópio operatório, revelou três canais mesiovestibulares adicionais. Depois de um apropriado desbridamento mecânico, desinfeção com hipoclorito de sódio e obturação com gutta-percha aquecida, foi possível perceber um resultado favorável no controlo dos 12 meses.

Palavras-chave: Anatomia, Endodontia,Molar maxilar,Raiz mesiovestibular, Cúspide paramolar, Tratamento endodôntico

 

Introduction

The success rates of root canal treatments are highly dependent on the technical procedures, such as mechanical debridement, disinfection, and obturation of the root canal system space.¹ Neglecting care during these procedures may contribute to the establishment of an intracanal infection, either due to the growth of bacteria previously present inside the root canal system space or due to coronal microleakage.

The misidentification of the tooth anatomy may lead to limitations in the clinical procedures and outcomes of the root canal therapy since the persistence of periapical pathology appears to be related to the failure to identify and treat all root canals.² This issue is of particular interest in maxillary molar treatments, which have a considerable prevalence of missed second mesiobuccal (MB2) root canals.² Their presence was first reported by Hess and Zurcher in 1925,³ and then gained clinical notoriety after 1969 when Weine correlated the clinical significance of misidentifying this anatomy with failed root canal treatment.⁴ Since then, the anatomy of the maxillary molars’ mesiobuccal (MB) root has been extensively investigated by several clinical and laboratory studies.⁵

The high prevalence of multiple root canals in the MB root may be associated with the broad buccolingual dimension of the root and the presence of concavities on its mesial and distal surfaces.⁶

Although fewer studies have analyzed the maxillary second molar (MSM) morphology compared to studies on the maxillary first molar’s, both revealed the existence of great anatomical variability.⁷ It is widely recognized that the root canal system morphology is highly variable and may display some quite uncommon configurations. However, to date, there is no report of the presence of four MB (MB1, MB2, MB3, and MB4) root canals in the MSM. Therefore, the present study aims to report the successful root canal treatment of an MSM with six canals, of which four were in the MB root.

Case report

A 37-year-old Caucasian female patient was referred to an endodontic appointment with complaints of constant pain on the maxillary right side with irradiation to the preauricular area, not associated with thermal stimuli. Her medical history was noncontributory. The intra-oral examination revealed a distobuccal (DB) caries and an occlusal amalgam restoration on the maxillary right second molar (tooth 17) (Figure 1). The buccal surface of the MB cusp had an additional cusp — a paracone. The patient had no pain on palpation, and the mobility test and periodontal probing were within the normal limits, but there was tenderness to vertical percussion with no response to the cold sensitivity test (Endo Cold Spray, Henry Schein, Langen, Germany). The radiographic examination, conducted with periapical radiographs using the paralleling technique (Rinn XCP endodontics, Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland), confirmed the presence of caries with no associated periapical lesion (Figure 2). The clinician established a diagnosis of pulp necrosis and symptomatic apical periodontitis.

 

Figure 1. Initial clinical photograph of tooth 17 revealing a large distobuccal decay and an extra cusp positioned on the buccal aspect of the traditional mesiobuccal cusp.

 

Figure 2. Initial periapical radiograph showing a secondary decay lesion.

 

The treatment plan was non-surgical root canal therapy, which the patient accepted verbally and by filling an informed consent form. Infiltrative buccal anesthesia was performed with articaine HCL 4% plus 1:200,000 epinephrine (Artinibsa, Inibsa, Spain), followed by absolute rubber dam isolation and removal of the pre-existing amalgam restoration. No cracks or fissures were noted. The access cavity was established using round burs and refined with ultrasonic tips Start-X no. 1 and no. 2 (Start-X, Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland) under magnification and lighting of a dental operating microscope (Alltion, Wuzhou, China). A careful observation of the pulp chamber floor revealed an extensive developmental groove between the MB and the palatal (P) root canals. The groove was explored with a DG-16 explorer and ultrasonic tips Start-X no. 1 and no. 2 (Start-X, Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland), and three additional root canals (MB2, MB3, and MB4) were noted (Figure 3).

 

Figure 3. Pulp chamber floor after endodontic access, revealing four mesiobuccal orifice openings and single distobuccal and palatal canal orifices.

 

The root canals, which showed a supplementary Vertucci’s type XXI (4-1), were negotiated, and patency was achieved with #8 and #10 K-files (Ready Steel, Dentsply Maillefer, Switzerland).

The working length was determined using an electronic apical locator (Root ZX Mini, Morita, Japan) and confirmed radiographically (Figure 4). Coronal preflaring was performed with an X rotary file (25.09, Endogal Endodontic System, Endogal, Spain) and the glide path with an A rotary file (15.03, Endogal Endodontic System, Endogal, Spain). The root canals were shaped also using Endogal System’s rotary files (Endogal endodontic system, Endogal, Spain) according to the manufacturer’s recommendations, at 250 rpm and 4.0 Ncm, with the sequence: B (20.04), C (25.04), and D (25.06) in all canals except for the MB, DB, and P root canals where the last file was an E (30.06) (Figure 5).

 

Figure 4. Working length periapical radiograph.

 

Figure 5. Pulp chamber after canal instrumentation with four independent mesiobuccal canal orifices.

 

Copious irrigation with 5.25% sodium hypochlorite (Dentaflux, J. Ripoll SL, Spain) was performed throughout the procedure using 5-mL syringes with open-ended flat 30-G needles (Luer-Lock, Medibase, France). At the end of the first appointment, a temporary filling (Cavit W, 3M ESPE, Germany) was used to restore the access cavity. In the second appointment, a final irrigation protocol was performed with 10% citric acid, saline, and 5.25% sodium hypochlorite. In the end, passive ultrasonic irrigation was conducted (Irrisafe 20, Acteon, France). The root canals were dried with paper points (Zipperer, VDW, Germany) and filled with gutta-percha and an epoxy resin-based sealer (AH Plus, Dentsply DeTrey, Germany) using the continuous wave of obturation technique accomplished with the B&L system (B&L, Biotech, Republic of Korea) (Figures 6 and 7). The access cavity was rinsed with alcohol, and the root canal orifices and the pulp chamber floor were sealed with flowable composite resin (Tetric EvoFlow, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein). The tooth was permanently restored with cusp coverage composite resin (Tetric EvoCeram, Ivoclar Vivadent, Liechtenstein). At the 12-month follow-up, the patient was completely asymptomatic (Figure 8).

 

Figure 6. Pulp chamber after root canal system obturation, showing four mesiobuccal canal orifices.

 

Figure 7. Final root canal treatment periapical radiograph.

 

Figure 8. Twelve-month recall radiograph showing no radiographic changes

Discussion and conclusions

Current studies on the MSM reveal the existence of high anatomical variability.^{7, 8} The inner complexity of the MB root develops during morphogenesis and represents a constant challenge for professionals during root canal treatment.

In young patients, the continuous deposition of secondary dentin may narrow the kidney-bean-shaped MB root canal in the mesiodistal direction, shaping it into an isthmus connecting both extremities that may eventually close in certain portions of its length, creating multiple root canals.⁹

Because the lingual portion of the MB root is smaller, this dentin deposition over time may reduce the canals to dimensions that make them more difficult to locate. Additionally, the possible merging and fusion with other canals may lead to a more difficult identification and negotiation of these MB palatal canals.¹⁰

According to a recent CBCT study in a Caucasian population that included 778 MSMs, the prevalence of three-rooted morphologies was 73% and the proportion of MB2 root canals was 44%, highlighting the higher anatomic variability in MB roots.¹¹ A recent meta-analysis that included cadaver imaging and intraoperative studies mentioned that the prevalence of the MB3 canal in MSMs was 0.3%.¹² Several in vitro studies from different populations documented a prevalence of three canals in MB roots ranging from 0.6% to 4.2%,^{7, 13} while in vivo assessments reported a prevalence between 0.2% and 1.8%.^{13, 14}

The discrepancy in MB3 canal prevalence among studies may be related not only to the assessment methodology but also to the sample variability, even though the percentages are recurrently low. Despite the efforts to improve the methodologies of anatomy study designs for findings reliable and duly updated as possible,¹⁵ the prevalence of the MB4 canal in MSMs has not been documented yet.

In the present case report, four root canals were noted in the MB root, displaying a supplementary Vertucci’s type XXI (4-1) configuration according to Sert and Bayirli¹⁶ with both DB and P roots showing a Vertucci’s type I. The fact that a fourth root canal was observed in the MB root of an MSM highlights the root canal system’s unpredictability and the need for a careful evaluation of the pulp chamber floor during endodontic procedures. Previously documented case reports showing six root canals in the MSM are uncommon. Junior et al.¹⁷ and Chawla et al.¹⁸ described this configuration with two MB, one DB, and three P root canals, while Suresh et al.¹⁹ reported an MSM with fused roots and the existence of three MB, two DB, and one P root canals and Kim et al.²⁰ documented two root canals in each of the three roots.

The present case also showed a paracone cusp. Firstly described by Bolk²¹ and later classified by Dahlberg,²² this extra cusp positioned on the buccal aspect of the traditional MB cusp may have its own pulp tissue and be linked to supplemental roots and root canal systems.²³ Therefore, its presence, although rare, should not be ignored.

Several studies report a significant difference in exploring the pulp chamber floor with or without magnification.²⁴ The use of the dental operative microscope became essential for detecting and managing all root canals in the present case.

Additionally, a proper access cavity design is of utmost importance for superior visualization of the entire pulp chamber floor and establishing straight-line access to the canal orifices. When extra canals in the MB root are suspected, the access opening may be extended mesially, creating a trapezoidal shape instead of a triangular one.^{25, 26}

The concomitant use of ultrasonic tips allows adequate exposure of the entire pulp chamber developmental grooves and respective canal orifices in a conservative manner, preserving pericervical dentin.²⁷ Moreover, recent evidence showed that the dentin thickness in the danger zone of MB2 and MB3 root canals might be low, suggesting that these root canals may be best prepared with smaller instruments to avoid excessive dentin removal from a thin area.^{5, 24} Due to the previous reasons, despite the small isthmus linking the four MB root canal entrances, the orifices were not united to avoid removing excessive dentin in the pulp chamber floor and from the pericervical area.

Additionally, these MB roots show great inner complexity involving multiple canals with merging and ramifications. Thus, proper debridement, irrigation protocol, and three-dimensional canal filling are even more technically sensitive and demanding.^{27, 28}

Knowledge of the internal root canal anatomy and its variations has a great impact on the diagnosis, management, and success of root canal treatment. Also, a specific armamentarium may be required to optimize the procedures, namely, the dental operative microscope, exploratory probes, and specific ultrasound tips. Therefore, adequate instruments combined with crown, root, and root canal anatomy awareness may lead to an outcome improvement of these cases. Figure 8. Twelve-month recall radiograph showing no radiographic changes.

 

References

¹ Friedman S. Prognosis of initial endodontic therapy. Endod Topics. 2002;2:59-88.

² Baruwa AO, Martins JN, Meirinhos J, et al. The influence of missed canals on the prevalence of periapical lesions in endodontically treated teeth: a cross-sectional study. J Endod. 2020;46:34-9.

³ Hess W, Zürcher E. The anatomy of the root-canals of the teeth of the permanent dentition. J. Bale, sons & Danielsson, Limited; 1925.

⁴ Weine FS, Healey HJ, Gerstein H, Evanson L. Canal configuration in the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary first molar and its endodontic significance. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1969;28:419-25.

⁵ Ordinola-Zapata R, Martins JNR, Plascencia H, et al. The MB3 canal in maxillary molars: a micro-ct study. Clin Oral Investig. 2020;24:4109-21.

⁶ Kulid JC, Peters DD. Incidence and configuration of canal systems in the mesiobuccal root of maxillary first and second molars. J Endod. 1990;16:311-7.

⁷ Ordinola‐Zapata R, Martins JNR, Bramante CM, et al. Morphological evaluation of maxillary second molars with fused roots: a micro‐CT study. Int Endod J. 2017;50:1192-200.

⁸ Wolf TG, Paqué F, Woop AC, et al. Root canal morphology and configuration of 123 maxillary second molars by means of micro-CT. Int J Oral Sci. 2017;9:33-7.

⁹ Eskoz N, Weine FS. Canal configuration of the mesiobuccal root of the maxillary second molar. J Endod. 1995;21:38-42.

¹⁰ Libfeld H, Rotstein I. Incidence of four-rooted maxillary second molars: literature review and radiographic survey of 1,200 teeth. J Endod. 1989;15:129-31.

¹¹ Martins JNR, Marques D, Mata A, Caramês J. Root and root canal morphology of the permanent dentition in a Caucasian population: a cone‐beam computed tomography study. Int Endod J. 2017;50:1013-26.

¹² Tomaszewska IM, Jarzębska A, Skinningsrud B, et al. An original micro‐CT study and meta‐analysis of the internal and external anatomy of maxillary molars—implications for endodontic treatment. Clin Anat. 2018;31:838-53.

¹³ Lee JH, Kim KD, Lee JK, et al. Mesiobuccal root canal anatomy of Korean maxillary first and second molars by cone-beam computed tomography. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol Oral Radiol Endod. 2011;111:785-91.

¹⁴ Martins JNR, Gu Y, Marques D, et al. Differences on the root and root canal morphologies between Asian and white ethnic groups analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2018;44:1096-104.

¹⁵ Martins JNR, Kishen A, Marques D, et al. Preferred reporting items for epidemiologic cross-sectional studies on root and root canal anatomy using cone-beam computed tomographic technology: a systematized assessment. J Endod. 2020; 46: 915-35.

¹⁶ Sert S, Bayirli GS. Evaluation of the root canal configurations of the mandibular and maxillary permanent teeth by gender in the turkish population. J Endod. 2004;30:391-8.

¹⁷ Júnior BP, Teixeira CS, Silva RG, et al. Treatment of a second maxillary molar with six canals. Aust Endod J. 2007;33:42-5.

¹⁸ Chawla A, Sujlana A, Dixit A. Re-treating a maxillary second molar with 6 root canals assisted by cone beam computed tomography. Gen Dent. 2015;63:e14-6.

¹⁹ Suresh M, Karthikeyan K, Mahalaxmi S. Maxillary second molar with fused root and six canals-a case report. J Clin Diag Res. 2017;11:35-7.

²⁰ Kim JR, Choi SB, Park SH. A maxillary second molar with 6 canals: a case report. Quintessence Int. 2008;39:61-4.

²¹ Bolk L. Problems of human dentition. Am J Anat. 1916;19:91-148.

²² Dahlberg AA. The evolutionary significance of the protostyled. Am J Phys Anthropol. 1950;8:15-25.

²³ Paras Mull J, Manjunath MK. Paramolar tubercule in endodontics: na overview, case report and specimen study. J Pierre Fauchard Acad. 2013;27:124-8.

²⁴ Buhrley LJ, Barrows MJ, BeGole EA, Wenckus CS. Effect of magnification on locating the MB2 canal in maxillary molars. J Endod. 2002;28:324-7.

²⁵ Stropko JJ. Canal morphology of maxillary molars: clinical observations of canal configurations. J Endod. 1999;25:446-50.

²⁶ Mamoun JS. The maxillary molar endodontic access opening: a microscope-based approach. Eur J Dent. 2016;10:439-46.

²⁷ Lea CS, Apicella MJ, Mines P, et al. Comparison of the obturation density of cold lateral compaction versus warm vertical compaction using the continuous wave of condensation technique. J Endod. 2005;31:37-9.

²⁸ Virdee S, Farnell D, Silva M, et al. The influence of irrigant activation, concentration and contact time on sodium hypochlorite penetration into root dentine: an ex vivo experiment. Int Endod J. 2020;53:986-97.

 

^*Corresponding author:

Jorge N.R. Martins

Correio eletrónico: jnr_martins@yahoo.com.br

 

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

 

CRediT authorship contribution statement

Flávia Cracel Nogueira: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. Mariana Domingos Pires: Formal analysis, Investigation, Writing – original draft. Abayomi O. Baruwa: Methodology, Project administration, Validation. Beatriz Pereira: Formal analysis, Validation, Writing – original draft. Jorge N.R. Martins: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Writing – original draft. António Ginjeira: Supervision, Writing – review & editing.

 

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare

 

1646-2890/© 2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária. Published by SPEMD.

This is an open access article under the CC BY-NC-ND license (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).