10.24873/j.rpemd.2022.06.865

Case Report

 

Endodontic retreatment of mandibular canines with two roots: A report of two cases

Retratamento endodôntico em caninos inferiores com duas raízes: Relato de dois casos

 

André Luiz da Costa Michelotto^1,* 0000-0001-7855-4407

Lisa Yurie Oda¹ 0000-0001-5203-5422

Ângela Toshie Araki Yamamoto² 0000-0003-4402-7531

Bruno Cavalini Cavenago¹ 0000-0003-3203-0899

Antonio Batista¹ 0000-0002-6571-6662

¹ Universidade Federal do Paraná, Curitiba, Brazil

² Universidade Cruzeiro do Sul, São Paulo, Brazil

 

^*Correspondence to:

 

Article history:

Received 30 November 2021

Accepted 31 May 2022

Available online 20 June 2022

 

Abstract

Mandibular canines usually have one root with one root canal. However, variations may occur. The present study reports two cases of successful retreatment of two mandibular canines with two roots and two root canals, a rarer configuration. In both cases reported  the unsuccessful treatment in the primary endodontic intervention was due to overlooking the lingual root canals, which were identified when periapical radiographs were taken at a mesial angle. Because canals missed during endodontic therapy may lead to periapical periodontitis, it is important to take radiographs from different angles, analyze the pulp chamber floor, and consider the variations in root canal morphologies. After performing the access cavity and observing an isthmus in both cases, the lingual root canals were located and instrumented. Calcium hydroxide dressing was used between appointments, and the root canals were filled with different sealers in each case (epoxy resin-based and bioceramic sealers). The follow-up X-rays taken 18 months later in the first case and 5 months later in the second case suggested normality of the periapical tissues. It is essential to use strategies that enable reaching the whole complexity of the root canal system during the canal cleaning, shaping, disinfection, and filling procedures in order to control the infection and achieve a successful endodontic treatment outcome.

Keywords: Anatomy; Endodontics; Root canal therapy

 

Resumo

Os caninos inferiores geralmente possuem uma raiz com um canal radicular. No entanto, este grupo dentário pode ter variações. O presente estudo relata dois casos de retratamento endodôntico com sucesso de dois caninos inferiores com duas raízes e dois canais radiculares, uma configuração mais rara. Em ambos os casos relatados, o insucesso do tratamento na intervenção endodôntica primária foi devido à não localização do canal radicular lingual, que foi visualizado quando as radiografias periapicais foram feitas com uma angulação mesial. Canais não localizados durante o tratamento endodôntico podem levar à periodontite apical, por isso é importante realizar radiografias em diferentes angulações, avaliar o pavimento da câmara pulpar e considerar as variações da morfologia radicular. Após a realização da cavidade de acesso e observação de um istmo em ambos os casos, os canais linguais foram localizados e instrumentados. Foi utilizada medicação de hidróxido de cálcio entre as consultas e os canais foram obturados com diferentes cimentos nos casos relatados (à base de resina epóxi e biocerâmico). O acompanhamento radiográfico realizado após 18 meses no primeiro caso e 5 meses no segundo caso sugeriu normalidade dos tecidos periapicais.

É essencial seguir estratégias para tratar a complexidade do sistema de canais radiculares durante a limpeza, modelagem, desinfeção e obturação do canal para controlar a infeção e alcançar um resultado bem-sucedido do tratamento endodôntico.

Palavras-chave: Anatomia; Endodontia; Tratamento endodôntico

 

Introduction

Knowledge of the internal anatomy and possible variations in the morphology of the root canal system is essential for performing successful endodontic therapy.¹ Clinicians must be prepared to identify and perform endodontic treatment of teeth that exhibit unusual configurations to ensure that the entire root canal system will be debrided and filled. Missed and untreated root canals can lead to unsuccessful endodontic treatment and may result in the development of apical periodontitis in up to 98.0% of cases.²

The permanent mandibular canines are among the dental groups that may have variations. Usually, the mandibular canine has one root with one root canal; however, frequent variations of two root canals and possibly even three root canals may occur. An uncommon root configuration also found is a mandibular canine with two roots and two canals.³ Three in-vivo studies using cone-beam computed tomography reported a prevalence of mandibular canines with two roots of 3.1%, 3.0%, and 2.41%, respectively.^{4 - 6} Another study found differences between genders, with a prevalence of 1.5% and 3.8% for males and females, respectively.⁷ Ex-vivo studies reported a prevalence of 1.7% and 11.1%, respectively.^{8, 9}

In view of the previous considerations, clinicians should be able to diagnose and perform endodontic treatment in a safe and predictable manner. Therefore, this report aims to

present the diagnosis and endodontic retreatment of two clinical cases of permanent mandibular canines with two roots.

Case Reports

After clinical and radiographic evaluation, a diagnosis was established, the condition was explained to the patients, and the treatment options were proposed. The patients signed a term of free and informed consent before treatment was initiated.

All the teeth were anesthetized with a mental nerve block infiltration using 1.8 ml of 2.0% mepivacaine with 1:100000 epinephrine (DFL, Rio de Janeiro, Brazil), and rubber dam isolation was established. The working length was determined with an electronic apex locator (Root Zx II, Morita, USA) and confirmed radiographically. All instrumentation was performed under copious syringe irrigation with 2.5% sodium hypochlorite. In all cases, the final rinse procedure also included irrigation for three minutes with 17.0% EDTA prior to a final sodium hypochlorite rinse before drying the canal with matched paper points # 30 (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany).

The whole treatment required two appointments. An intracanal dressing with calcium hydroxide paste (UltraCal XS, Ultradent, USA) was applied between visits, and a glass-ionomer cement (Ionofast, Biodinâmica, Brazil) was used as a provisional restoration.

In the second visit, a final irrigation protocol that included rinses with 17.0% EDTA and 2.5% sodium hypochlorite was performed. The canals were dried with paper points, and root canal filling was performed with gutta-percha cones (Odous de Deus, Belo Horizonte, Brazil), using the single-cone technique and AH Plus sealer (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) in the first case report and BioRootTM RCS (Septodont, Saint-Maurdes-Fossés, France) in the second. The access cavities were temporarily restored, and the patients were referred for coronal rehabilitation.

Case #1

The patient, a 63-year-old Caucasian woman, was referred due to odontalgia in tooth 43 diagnosed as symptomatic apical periodontitis. The endodontic treatment had been performed 2 months earlier, and because the tooth remained sensitive, the prosthetist did not proceed with the prosthetic treatment.

As the pain intensified, the patient was referred for an evaluation. The initial periapical radiograph suggested the presence of an additional root. A second radiograph, taken in the mesiodistal direction, confirmed the presence of that second lingual root, which had not been treated (Figures 1 and 2).

 

Figure 1. Initial radiograph of tooth 43.

 

Figure 2. Radiograph in the mesioradial direction showing the presence of the lingual root.

 

After suitable anesthesia, the absolute isolation clamp required on the tooth to be treated was positioned to place it on tooth 44, and teeth 43 and 42 were isolated (Figure 3). A round high-speed diamond bur (1014, KG Sorensen, Cotia, Brazil) was used to remove the temporary filling where an isthmus in the lingual region had previously been observed. After locating the lingual canal with a C-Pilot #10 file (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany) (Figure 3), the purulent exudate was drained. The canal was negotiated with C-Pilot # 10 and # 15 files (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany) and instrumented with a Mtwo rotary system (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany), up to instrument #35.04, according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The root canal was disinfected, and a calcium hydroxide dressing was used for two weeks.

 

Figure 3. Location of the lingual canal using a #15 hand file at the working length.

 

At the second visit, because the tooth was asymptomatic, the clinician decided not to retreat the buccal canal. A new disinfection protocol was performed, and root canal obturation was completed (Figure 4). The patient was referred for prosthetic rehabilitation. After 18 months, a follow-up X-ray suggested normality of the periapical tissues, and the patient showed no symptoms (Figure 5).

 

 

Figure 4. Final radiograph.

 

 

Figure 5. 18-month follow-up radiograph showing periapical tissue normality.

 

Case #2

The patient, a 77-year-old Caucasian woman, was referred for endodontic retreatment of tooth 33 due to asymptomatic apical periodontitis (Figure 6). The access cavity was performed with a round high-speed diamond bur (1014, KG Sorensen, Cotia, Brazil) under suitable anesthesia and rubber dam isolation.

 

 

Figure 6. Initial radiograph of tooth 33

 

After locating the root canal, the filling material was removed using a Reciproc Classic #25 instrument (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany), without solvent, and a radiograph was taken to confirm the working length (Figure 7). The radiograph taken from a mesioradial angle suggested the presence of an additional root on the lingual surface. An operating microscope (16x magnification) and a pear-shaped diamond ultrasonic tip (E6D, Helse, São Paulo, Brazil) were used to remove dentin in the lingual direction, revealing the presence of an isthmus and evidencing the lingual root canal. The root canal was located and negotiated with C-Pilot # 10 and # 15 files (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany) (Figure 8) and instrumented with a Reciproc

 

Figure 7. Radiograph after filling was removed from the buccal canal, showing evidence of the lingual root.

 

 

Figure 8. Lingual canal negotiated with a #15 hand file and buccal canal instrumented with a Reciproc Blue #40.

 

Blue #25 (VDW Dental, Munich, Germany), according to the manufacturer’s instructions. The buccal root canal was instrumented with a Reciproc Blue #40 instrument. The root canals were disinfected, and a calcium hydroxide dressing was used between visits.

One month later, in the second visit, a new disinfection protocol was performed, and root canal obturation was completed (Figure 9). The patient was returned to her referring clinician to continue her dental treatment. A follow-up X-ray was taken 5 months later. Radiographic findings indicated a healing process of the periapical lesion (Figure 10).

 

 

Figure 9. Final radiograph

 

 

Figure 10. 5-month follow-up radiograph showing healing of periapical tissues

 

Discussion and Conclusions

The anatomy of root canal systems and the anatomical variations found in the different types of teeth provide information that might improve the outcome of endodontic treatment.¹⁰ In both cases reported, the unsuccessful treatment in the primary endodontic intervention was related to the presence of microorganisms in the root canals that were not identified, which can result from an unsystematic radiographic examination, inadequate access cavities, or improper observation of the pulp chamber.¹¹

As radiographs only provide two-dimensional information, they may not reveal missed canals in all cases. However, this may be overcome by cone-beam computed tomography, which provides three-dimensional information and higher sensitivity for evaluating changes in hard tissues.² In the present two cases, periapical radiographs taken at a mesial angle were used to find canals that had been overlooked.

Different angles are recommended to help find and locate extra canals.^{11, 13} In both cases, the two-rooted mandibular canines had two canals, one in each root, in agreement with several studies.^{8, 9, 14 - 16} They were classified as type V according to Vertucci,¹² and coded as 233 1B1 L1 according to Ahmed’s system.¹⁷

Mandibular canines with two roots are generally shorter than single-rooted canines.¹⁵ The roots are in a bucolingual direction, with the buccal root being slightly longer than the lingual root,6 as reported in several studies.^{4, 15, 16} However, one study found no significant difference in the lengths of the buccal and lingual roots in females.⁶ Regarding wideness, two studies have reported that the buccal root was larger than the lingual root in 47.7% and 41.5% of teeth.^{14, 15}

On the other hand, another study found the same prevalence of lingual roots larger than buccal roots (36.0%) and buccal roots larger than lingual roots (36.0%).¹⁶ These studies also found 43.1%, 35.1%, and 28.0% of mandibular canines with equal-sized roots.^{14, 16}

Root bifurcation has been reported as more prevalente (45.4%, 81.2%, and 58.0%) in the middle third^{6, 14, 16} and common in the apical third (35.1% and 44.0%).^{14, 16} However, one study found bifurcation in the apical third to be more prevalente (56.9%), followed by the middle third (40%).¹⁵ These studies described bifurcation in the coronal third as the rarest. ^{6, 14 - 16}

Studies have reported a prevalence of roots with buccal curvature of 49.2%, 27.2%, and 14.0% in buccal roots and 37.6%, 69.2%, and 79.0% in lingual roots, observed from a bucolingual aspect.^{14 - 16} Straight roots were observed in 38.5%, 41.5%, and 58.0% of buccal roots^{14 - 16} and 29.2% and 29.8% of lingual roots.^{14, 15} Only a small proportion of the roots exhibited a lingual curvature, with 12.3%, 2.6%, and 7.0% in buccal roots^{14 - 16} and 1.5% and 2.6% in lingual roots.^{14, 15}

Single-rooted mandibular canines are moderately narrow in the mesiodistal direction but very broad in the bucolingual direction, and comparable anatomy is observed in two-rooted canines.^{3, 15} Furthermore, in two-rooted canines, a lingual shoulder must be removed to gain access to the entrance of a second canal, as the lingual wall has an almost slit-like appearance compared with the larger buccal wall.³ The suggested technique has been to cut an “inverted pear-shaped” cavity with sufficient lingual extension to remove the lingual shoulder of the dentine for adequate instrumentation.¹⁵

The pulp chamber floor and wall anatomy also help determine which morphology is actually present.¹³ The use of magnification and illumination is considered of key importance for the successful treatment outcome of endodontic procedures.^{11, 13, 18} In the second case reported, an operating microscope and ultrasonic tips were used for locating the root canals.

The single-cone technique using gutta-percha cones with greater taper turns the root canal filling into a faster and simpler procedure while minimizing the forces applied to the root canal walls by spreaders without decreasing the quality of the apical sealing.¹⁹ In the first case, the epoxy resin-based sealer AH Plus (Dentsply, Konstanz, Germany) was used. In the second case, the most recent bioceramic sealer BioRootTM RCS (Septodont, Saint-Maur-des-Fossés, France) was used, which, among its main properties, presents bioactivity. Both sealers have high success rates with excellent clinical results.²⁰

To achieve a successful endodontic treatment in teeth with anatomical variations, it is important that the clinician is knowledgeable and trained and uses the technological resources available, such as magnification and ultrasonic tips.²¹

 

References

¹. Silva EJNL, Prado MC, Duarte MAH, Versiani MA, Marques D, Martins JNR. Prevalence of root canal system configurations in the brazilian population analyzed by cone-beam computed tomography - a systematic review. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2021;62:69-80.

². Costa FFNP, Pacheco-Yanes J, Siqueira JF, Oliveira ACS, Gazzaneo I, Amorim CA, et al. Association between missed canals and apical periodontitis. Int Endod J. 2019;52:400-6.

³. Versiani MA, Pécora JD,Sousa-Neto MD. Update in root canal anatomy of permanent teeth using microcomputed tomography. In: Basrani B. editor. Endodontic Irrigation. 1 ed. Cham: Springer 2015. p. 15-44.

⁴. Candeiro GTM, Teixeira IMMD, Barbosa DAO, Vivacqua-Gomes N, Alves FRF. Vertucci’s root canal configuration of 14,413 mandibular anterior teeth in a Brazilian population: a prevalence study using cone-beam computed tomography. J Endod. 2021;47:404-8.

⁵. Estrela C, Bueno MR, Couto GS, Rabelo LE, Alencar AH, Silva RG, et al. Study of root canal anatomy in human permanent teeth in a subpopulation of Brazil’s center region using cone-beam computed tomography - Part 1. Braz Dent J. 2015;26:530-6.

⁶. Kayaoglu G, Peker I, Gumusok M, Sarikir C, Kayadugun A, Ucok O. Root and canal symmetry in the mandibular anterior teeth of patients attending a dental clinic: CBCT study. Braz Oral Res. 2015;29:1- 7.

⁷. Martins JNR, Marques D, Francisco H, Caramês J. Gende  influence on the number of roots and root canal system configuration in human permanent teeth of a Portuguese subpopulation. Quintessence Int. 2018;49:103-11.

⁸. Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD, Saquy PC. Internal anatomy, direction and number of roots and size of human mandibular canines. Braz Dent J . 1993;4:53-7.

⁹. Hession RW. Endodontic morphology: II. A radiographic analysis. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol. 1977;44:610-20.

¹⁰. Barletta FB, Dotto SR, Reis MS, Ferreira R, Travassos RMC. Mandibular molar with five root canals. Aust Endod J. 2008;34:129-32.

¹¹. Fumei G, Ferretti G, Augusti D, Augusti G, Re D. Endodontic retreatment of a lower canine associated with a periapical lesion: case report of an unusual anatomy. G Ital Endod. 2014;28:17-22.

¹². Vertucci FJ. Root canal anatomy of the human permanente teeth. Oral Surg Oral Med Oral Pathol . 1984;58:589-99.

¹³. Vertucci FJ. Root canal morphology and its relationship to endodontic procedures. Endodontic Topics. 2005;10:3-29.

¹⁴. Beltes P, Kantilieraki E, Kalaitzoglou ME, Beltes C, Angelopoulos C. Mandibular canines with additional roots: an ex vivo study of the external and internal morphology. Aust Endod J . 2019;45:184-188.

¹⁵. Sharma R, Pécora JD, Lumley PJ, Walmsley AD. The external and internal anatomy of human mandibular canine teeth with two roots. Endod Dent Traumatol. 1998;14:88-92.

¹⁶. Versiani MA, Pécora JD, Sousa-Neto MD. The anatomy of two-rooted mandibular canines determined using microcomputed tomography. Int Endod J . 2011;44:682-7.

¹⁷. Ahmed HMA, Versiani MA, De-Deus G, Dummer PMH. A new system for classifying root and root canal morphology. Int Endod J . 2017;50:761-70.

¹⁸. Pires MD, Martins JNR. Endodontic treatment of the mandibular first molar with three distal root canals - Case series. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac . 2019;60:137-44.

¹⁹. Tasdemir T, Yesilyurt C, Ceyhanli KT, Celik D, Er K. Evaluation of apical filling after root canal filling by 2 different techniques. J Can Dent Assoc. 2009;75:201a-201d.

²⁰. Zavattini A, Knight A, Foschi F, Mannocci F. Outcome of Root Canal Treatments Using a New Calcium Silicate Root Canal Sealer: A Non-Randomized Clinical Trial. J Clin Med. 2020;9:1-9.

²¹. Bardini G, Casula L, Ambu E, Musu D, Mercade M, Cotti E. A 12-month follow-up of primary and secondary root canal treatment in teeth obturated with a hydraulic sealer. Clin Oral Invest. 2021;25:2757-64.

 

^*Corresponding author:

André Luiz da Costa Michelotto

Correio eletrónico: andremichelotto@hotmail.com

 

Conflict of interest

The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.

 

Ethical disclosures

Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that the procedures followed were in accordance with the regulations of the relevant clinical research ethics committee and with those of the Code of Ethics of the World Medical Association (Declaration of Helsinki).

Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that they have followed their work center protocols on access to patient data and for its publication.

Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors have obtained the written informed consent of the patients or subjects mentioned in the article. The corresponding author is in possession of this document.

 

CRediT authorship contribution statement

André Luiz da Costa Michelotto: Conceptualization, Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Visualization, Writing - review & editing. Lisa Yurie Oda: Data curation, Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & editing.

Angela Toshie Araki Yamamoto: Investigation, Methodology, Visualization, Writing - original draft, Writing - review & Editing.

Bruno Cavalini Cavenago: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project Administration, Writing - review & editing.

Antonio Batista: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Resources, Supervision, Writing - review & editing.

 

© 2022 Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária. Publicado por SPEMD.

Este é um artigo Open Access sob uma licença CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).