Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia, Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial
SPEMD - Revista Portuguesa de Estomatologia Medicina Dentária e Cirurgia Maxilofacial | 2024 | 65 (3) | 156-161
Clinical innovation
Fabrication of a closed hollow obturator by digital technologies: Technical report
Fabrico de um obturador oco fechado por tecnologias digitais: Descrição técnica
a Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Unidade de Investigação e Ciências Orais e Biomédicas (UICOB), Lisbon, Portugal
b Laboratório de Instrumentação, Engenharia Biomédica e Física da Radiação (LIBPhys), Lisbon, Portugal
Isabel Gomes - isabel.gomes@fmd.ulisboa.pt
Article Info
Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac
Volume - 65
Issue - 3
Clinical innovation
Pages - 156-161
Go to Volume
Article History
Received on 25/05/2024
Accepted on 23/09/2024
Available Online on 30/09/2024
Keywords
Technical/Clinical innovation
Fabrication of a closed hollow obturator by digital technologies: Technical report
Fabrico de um obturador oco fechado por tecnologias digitais: Descrição técnica
Isabel Gomes1,* 0000-0002-9509-7495
João Paulo Martins1 0000-0001-9330-772X
Luís Miguel Pires Lopes1,2 0000-0001-8633-827X
1 Universidade de Lisboa, Faculdade de Medicina Dentária, Unidade de Investigação e Ciências Orais e Biomédicas (UICOB), Lisbon, Portugal
2 Laboratório de Instrumentação, Engenharia Biomédica e Física da Radiação (LIBPhys), Lisbon, Portugal
Article history:
Received 25 May 2024
Accepted 23 September 2024
Available online 30 September 2024
Abstract
Different techniques have been described for fabricating obturators for patients with maxillary defects. The hollow bulb obturator has emerged as the treatment of choice in most patients due to its light weight, decreased stress on the underlying tissues, and decreased patient discomfort. This article presents a technique for fabricating a closed hollow bulb obturator using a laboratory scanner, computer- aided design software, and three-dimensional printing.
Keywords: Palatal obturators, Maxillofacial prosthesis, Three-dimensional printing
Resumo
Várias técnicas foram descritas para a construção de obturadores para reabilitar os pacientes com defeitos maxilares. O obturador de bulbo oco é o tratamento de eleição na maioria dos pacientes devido ao seu baixo peso, reduzida carga nos tecidos subjacentes e menor desconforto para o paciente. Este artigo apresenta uma técnica para a obtenção de um obturador de bulbo oco fechado, usando um scanner de laboratório, um programa de desenho por computador e impressão 3D.
Palavras-chave: Prótese obturadora, Prótese maxilofacial, Impressão tridimensional
Introduction
Maxillary defects may occur due to congenital malformations or acquired defects, such as trauma or ablative surgery in oral cancer. They can result in oronasal communication, which may cause masticatory and deglutition difficulty, impaired speech, and facial disfigurement.1 The prosthodontist plays na important role in rehabilitating such defects since reconstructive surgery may not always be indicated.2
The prosthetic rehabilitation for total and partial maxillary defects implies separating the oral and nasal cavities to allow adequate deglutition and improve speech. Supporting the orbital contents may also be important to prevent enophthalmos and diplopia, and supporting the soft tissues promotes an acceptable aesthetic result.1, 3
A prosthesis used to close a maxillary defect in a dentulous or edentulous patient is called an obturator.1 The obturator has one bulb portion, which is the part that accommodates the defect area, improving seal and retention. Restoration of significant oronasal defects requires a larger prosthesis, making it heavier. A heavier prosthesis applies higher stress on the underlying tissues and causes discomfort to the patient.4 Furthermore, with a heavy obturator, gravity is a dislodging factor that affects the prosthesis stability and retention, especially in edentulous patients with no implant retention. One way to reduce the obturators weight is by making a hollow bulb obturator.5 A previous study showed that hollow design reduced the weight of the obturator prostheses by up to 33%, depending on the size of the defect.6
There are two types of hollow bulbs: open and closed.1 Both types of obturators are lightweight prostheses the patient can easily tolerate. However, open hollow bulb obturators often collect mucous, food, and fluids, requiring numerous cleanings and potentially leading to malodor and increased weight. On the other hand, closed hollow bulb obturators do not pool moisture while still extending adequately into the defect. Although a closed hollow obturator has many advantages, the complexity of its fabrication prevents it from being widely used. Thus, the open hollow obturator is constructed more frequently.1
Various materials and techniques have been described for closed hollow obturator fabrication, including dissolvable materials such as sugar7 and ice,8 which work as spacers to create the bulb chamber. After resin polymerization, the sugar or the ice is drained through a drainage hole. Generally, this hole is posteriorly sealed with auto-polymerizing acrylic resin, becoming a potential site for leakage and discoloration. An alternative technique that does not involve emptying the bulb is the construction of an open hollow bulb obturator and a separate palatal part or canopy cover, which are subsequently joined using auto-polymerizing acrylic.9 Other techniques have been described to avoid repairs with auto-polymerizing acrylics, such as the double-flask technique involving two flasks with interchangeable parts.10 In this technique, the entire process is carried out in a flask with thermo-polymerizing acrylic resin. However, it requires extra laboratory steps and highly skilled laboratory technicians, being time-consuming and technique-sensitive.
Current innovations and technology developments in computer-aided design and computer-aided manufacture (CADCAM) allow the fully digitalized design and manufacture of removable dental prostheses.11 Using 3D optical shaping equipment with rapid prototyping techniques offers significant advantages by allowing the fabrication of single-piece closed hollow bulb obturators with no joints, thereby eliminating the limitations of traditional fabrication.12, 13
This technical report aims to describe a digital laboratory workflow to fabricate an obturator with a closed hollow bulb using an optical 3D scanner, design by a software program, and rapid prototyping manufacturing technology.
Description of the technique
1. Make a definitive impression of the edentulous maxilla and opposing jaw and create definitive casts (Figure 1). Fabricate record bases and occlusion rims to articulate the definitive casts (Figure 2).
Figure 1. Definitive stone casts
Figure 2. Maxillomandibular relationship record
2. Scan the definitive casts and maxillomandibular relationship using a dental laboratory scanner (S600 ARTI, Zirkonzahn, Italy) and import the digital files to a comercial CAD software program (Modellier by Zirkonzahn, Italy) (Figures 3, 4).
Figure 3. Digital maxillary cast.
Figure 4. Virtual maxillomandibular relationship.
3. Select artificial teeth from a digital library (AIDA, Zirkonzahn library, Italy), according to the lines drawn on the wax rims, and set them using the same software (Modellier by Zirkonzahn, Italy) (Figure 5). Then, draw the limits of the obturator (Figure 6) and design the dentures using the same CAD software program (Figure 7).
Figure 5. Teeth selected from a digital library and set using the wax rim as a reference.
Figure 6. Prosthesis limits drawn on the digital maxillary cast.
Figure 7. Digital design of the maxillary and mandibular dentures.
4. Export the obturator in an STL file format to the Autodesk Meshmixer software and design the hollow obturator part using the Hollow function in the Edit menu. Extract the data for the entire obturator part using the off set distance, leaving a 3-mm thick outer border (Figures 8, 9).
Figure 8. Digital design of the hollow bulb identified with a green color.
Figure 9. Sagittal section showing uniform thickness of digital hollow bulb.
5. Export the obturator in an STL file format and prepare to manufacture the obturator additively with the light-polymerizing micro-filled hybrid resin (C&B MFH, Nextdent, Netherlands), color N1.5, and a 3D printer (Nextdent LCD1, Nextdent B.V., Netherlands). Before printing, define the support pins (number and location) automatically (Figure 10).
Figure 10. The printing software automatically defined the number and location of support pins.
6. After printing, remove the prosthesis from the printer (Figure 11) and ultrasonically clean it with 99.5% isopropyl alcohol (AGA, Portugal) for 15 minutes.
Figure 11. Obturator immediately after printing
7. After cleaning, expose the dentures to a final photopolymerization in an LC-3D Print Box (Nextdent B.V., The Netherlands) for 10 minutes (Figure 12).
Figure 12. Final photopolymerization.
8. Cut back the support structures. Then, cover the gingival area with a thin layer of pink auto-polymerizing acrylic (Probase Auto, Ivoclar Vivadent). Pigment each tooth individually with a photopolymerized acrylic (Vita Akzent LC, Vita Zahnfabrik, Germany) for a more natural appearance and better aesthetics (Figure 13).
Figure 13. Obturator prosthesis with a layer of pink acrylic on the outer face of the prosthesis simulating natural gingiva
9. Finish and polish the obturator prosthesis for delivery (Figure 14). When testing this technique, after completing the obturator manufacturing process, it was cut to verify that its interior Figure 3. Digital maxillary cast. was hollow (Figure 15).
Figure 14. Intaglio view of obturator prosthesis.
Figure 15. Sagittal section of the obturator showing the interior of the hollow bulb.
Discussion
This technical report describes a digital laboratory workflow to fabricate a 3D-printed obturator prosthesis with a closed hollow bulb. Many traditional methods have been proposed to fabricate an obturator with a hollow bulb.7, 8 However, these techniques are complex and pose issues, such as an uneven thickness of the hollow space and a non-uniform prosthesis thickness for the obturator. It may also be challenging to remove materials inside the bulb through the small holes drilled in the prosthesis after processing, and there are limitations to auto-polymerizing acrylic repairs.13
Although CAD-CAM technologies allow for the digital designing and manufacturing of obturator prostheses,13, 14 there is currently no effective way to fabricate the closed hollow bulb obturator with the commercially available dental digital design software programs. An alternative program (the Autodesk Meshmixer) is required to overcome these limitations. Additionally, the machines and software programs used are expensive and require extensive training and post-processing for better aesthetics. 3D printing of the entire prosthesis may offer some advantages, but it has the aesthetic limitation of producing a prosthesis in only one color. Dental pigmentation and pink resin application to the vestibular flap is a procedure already described that offers adequate aesthetics.15
Conclusions
Additive manufacturing is a suitable alternative to conventional techniques for fabricating a closed hollow obturator. However, commercially available dental CAD software programs may require additional software to complete the design.
References
1. Keyf F. Obturator prostheses for hemimaxillectomy patients. J Oral Rehabil.2001;28:821-9. PMID: 11580820
2. König J, Kelemen K, Váncsa S, Szabó B, Varga G, Mikulás K, et al. Comparative analysis of surgical and prosthetic rehabilitation in maxillectomy: A systematic review and meta-analysis on quality-of-life scores and objective speech and masticatory measurements. J Prosthet Dent. 2023:S0022-3913(23)00775-8. Online ahead of print.
3. Wang RR. Sectional prosthesis for total maxillectomy patients: a clinical report. J Prosthet Dent. 1997;78:241-4.
4. Alfaraj A, Su FY, Lin WS. CAD-CAM Hollow Obturator Prosthesis: A Technical Report. J Prosthodont. 2022;31:635-8.
5. Spatz HI, Schmitz JT, Singh A, Golden M, Riedel E, Randazzo JD, et al. Comparison of the weight of conventionally heat-processed hollow and solid obturators and 3D printed hollow obturators. J Prosthet Dent. 2023:S0022-3913(23)00645-5. Online ahead of print.
6. Wu YL, Schaaf NG. Comparison of weight reduction in different designs of solid and hollow obturator prostheses. J Prosthet Dent. 1989;62:214-7.
7. Matalon V, LaFuente H. A simplified method for making a hollow obturator. J Prosthet Dent. 1976;36:580-2.
8. Schneider A. Method of fabricating a hollow obturator. J Prosthet Dent. 1978;40:351.
9. Chalian VA, Barnett MO. A new technique for constructing a one-piece hollow obturator after partial maxillectomy. J Prosthet Dent. 1972;28:448-53.
10. el Mahdy AS. Processing a hollow obturator. J Prosthet Dent. 1969;22:682-6.
11. Wang C, Shi YF, Xie PJ, Wu JH. Accuracy of digital complete dentures: A systematic review of in vitro studies. J Prosthet Dent. 2021;125:249-56.
12. Koyama S, Sato N, Mito T, Izumita K, Sasaki K. Hermeticity of a hollow obturator model using CAD and rapid prototyping technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;124:123-7.
13. Koyama S, Kato H, Harata T, Sasaki K. A workflow for fabricating a hollow obturator by using 3D digital technologies. J Prosthet Dent. 2020;123:648-52.
14. Fernandez PK, Kuscu E, Weise H, Engel EM, Spintzyk S. Rapid additive manufacturing of an obturator prosthesis with the use of an intraoral scanner: A dental technique. J Prosthet Dent. 2022;127:189-93.
15. Gomes I, Branco C, Martins JP, Lopes LP. 3D printed dentures case report. Rev Port Estomatol Med Dent Cir Maxilofac. 2024;65:85-93.
*
Isabel Gomes
E-mail address: isabel.gomes@fmd.ulisboa.pt
Conflict of interest
The authors have no conflicts of interest to declare.
Ethical disclosures
Protection of human and animal subjects. The authors declare that no experiments were performed on humans or animals for this study.
Confidentiality of data. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.
Right to privacy and informed consent. The authors declare that no patient data appear in this article.
CRediT authorship contribution statement
Isabel Gomes: Conceptualization, Investigation, Methodology, Project administration, Supervision, Validation, Visualization, Writing review & editing. João Paulo Martins: Methodology, Supervision, Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing review & editing. Luís Miguel Pires Lopes: Visualization, Conceptualization, Writing review & editing.
© 2024 Sociedade Portuguesa de Estomatologia e Medicina Dentária.
Publicado por SPEMD. Este é um artigo Open Access sob uma licença CC BY-NC-ND (http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/).